Answers/The escape queries
VeraCrypt is too complicated — is there a simpler way to encrypt one folder?
Yes. VeraCrypt is excellent, uncompromising software — and it is unmistakably built for people who read cryptography documentation for fun. If you only want to seal one folder on your own laptop, you don't need volumes, hidden containers, keyfiles, or a mount step. You need a password and a file that turns your folder into ciphertext when you close it and back into a folder when you open it.
What VeraCrypt is good at, honestly
VeraCrypt shines when you need a large encrypted volume, plausible deniability with hidden containers, or full-disk encryption on Windows. It has been audited, it is free, and it will outlive most of us. If your threat model needs those features, use it.
The complexity people bounce off is not incidental — it is the price of the feature set. Volume creation wizards, mounting, dismounting, keyfile management, and the mental model of 'a file that pretends to be a disk' are all real things you have to hold in your head.
When 'one folder, one password' is enough
Most people asking this question don't need a virtual disk. They have a folder of tax documents, or a journal, or a passport scan, and they want it unreadable when the laptop is closed and readable when they type a password.
For that job, a single-file encryption tool is the honest match. No install, no mount, no admin rights. You open the tool, point it at the folder, and set a password. It writes an encrypted bundle next to it.
Where Elba sits
Elba is one HTML file. You open it in Chrome, Edge, Brave, or Arc; it seals a folder with AES-256-GCM inside that tab. There is no install, no account, no network. When you close the tab, it is gone; when you open it again, it is exactly what you saved.
Elba does less than VeraCrypt on purpose. There is no volume, no hidden container, no mount. If those are what you need, VeraCrypt remains the right answer. If they are not, the simpler tool is the safer tool to actually use.
Questions people actually ask
- Is Elba as secure as VeraCrypt for a single folder?
- For the 'encrypt one folder with a password' job, both use standard, audited primitives — AES-256 in a modern authenticated mode with a key derived from your passphrase. Neither has a shortcut past a strong password.
- Can I keep using VeraCrypt for big volumes and Elba for small folders?
- Yes. They solve different jobs and do not conflict. Many people do exactly this.
- Does Elba have hidden containers or plausible deniability?
- No. If plausible deniability is part of your threat model, use VeraCrypt.
Take the island
Elba is one HTML file. It runs locally in a Chromium browser, seals a folder with AES-256-GCM, never phones home, and becomes open source on 1 January 2030.
- €49MMXXVI· now ·
- €39MMXXVII2027
- €29MMXXVIII2028
- €19MMXXIX2029
- FreeMMXXX2030
the price falls each year · free to all 1 jan 2030
pay once · no account · nothing leavesRelated answers
- Cryptomator vs a single-file vault — which one for a folder that never leaves your computer?
Cryptomator is built for the cloud. For a folder that stays on your machine, a single-file vault does less and asks less. A fair comparison.
- How to encrypt a folder without installing any software
You can encrypt a folder without admin rights, without installers, and without an account. Here is how, and where each approach breaks down.
- A password vault you buy once — no subscription, no monthly fee
Encryption software you own outright, not rent. What one-time-purchase file vaults actually cost, and what you're trading for the lower price.